Tag Archive for European Commission

Philips to exit hi-fis and video

Philips light bulbsPhilips is the world’s leading manufacturer of lighting

Dutch electronics giant Philips is to sell off its home entertainment business, including hi-fis and DVD players, to Japan’s Funai Electric.

Funai will pay 150m euros ($200m; £130m) and a regular brand licensing fee to take on the product lines.

The company wants to focus on its healthcare, light bulbs and home appliances businesses as part of its “Accelerate!” restructuring plan.

Philips also reported a 355m-euro loss for the last three months of 2012.

The loss was in line with expectations and was largely due to a 509m-euro fine imposed on the company last year by the European Commission for participating in a cartel to fix prices in the television business.

Philips announced last year that it was transferring its loss-making television unit to a new joint venture arrangement with Hong Kong’s TPV.

Its latest divestments will not happen immediately – its audio business will pass to Funai in the latter half of this year, while the transfer of its video business will not take place until 2017.

The Dutch firm’s underlying profitability in the last quarter – net of the fine and various restructuring costs – improved to 875m euros, beating the expectations of most market analysts.

However, chief executive Frans van Houten said he expected sales to remain subdued in the first half of this year, because of the “challenging market” in the US and Europe, which account for well over half of Philips’ revenues.

Article source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-21242127#sa-ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=PublicRSS20-sa

Google avoids legal action in US

People's silhouettes in front of the Google logoThe FTC has been looking at whether Google manipulates search results to steer users to its sites

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has decided not to take legal action against Google at the end of a 19-month investigation into the search giant.

It found Google had not biased its search results to favour its products.

Google has agreed to give advertisers access to more information about their campaigns and has agreed not to use other providers’ material such as product reviews in its search results.

Google is still awaiting a competition ruling from the European Commission.

Another key concession applies to how Google uses the patents it bought when it acquired Motorola Mobility last year for $12.5bn (£7.9bn).

Google has said it will charge “fair and reasonable” rates to companies that need to use its standard essential patents.

Standard essential patents are ones that are critical to industry standards, for example, the technology that allows devices such as smartphones and tablets to connect to the internet over wi-fi.

It has agreed not to take out injunctions forcing licensees to remove their products from sale if there are disagreements about how much a fair rate should be.

‘Disappointing and premature’

Rivals had called for stronger sanctions to be taken against Google.

Fairsearch, an organisation representing several of Google’s critics such as Microsoft, said in a statement: “The FTC’s decision to close its investigation with only voluntary commitments from Google is disappointing and premature, coming just weeks before the company is expected to make a formal and detailed proposal to resolve the four abuses of dominance identified by the European Commission, first among them biased display of its own properties in search results.”

The FTC was asked to investigate whether Google was favouring its own products in search results.

FTC chairman Jon Leibowitz told a press conference that the commission had found no evidence that Google’s search engine was biased towards its own services.

“Some may believe the commission should have done more, but for our part we do follow the facts where they lead,” he said.

“We do it with appropriate rigour. This brings to an end the investigation. It is good for consumers, it is good for competition and it is the right thing to do.”

One of the biggest changes to be implemented by Google will allow advertisers to copy ad campaign data to other search engines, such as Microsoft’s Bing.

Google is also promising that it will stop copying content from other websites to use in its summaries, even though the company had insisted the practice was legal under the fair-use provisions of US copyright law.

In response to the settlement, Google’s chief legal officer David Drummond said in a blog post: “The US Federal Trade Commission today announced it has closed its investigation into Google after an exhaustive 19-month review that covered millions of pages of documents and involved many hours of testimony.

“The conclusion is clear: Google’s services are good for users and good for competition.”

Big fine

It does not mean that the search giant is out of the woods on the issue of anti-competitive practices.

Alongside the FTC investigation, Google is still under scrutiny from the European Union.

In December, the EU’s Competition Commission gave the search giant a month to address four key areas:

  • the manner in which Google displays “its own vertical search services differently” from other, competing products
  • how Google “copies content” from other websites – such as restaurant reviews – to include within its own services
  • the “exclusivity” Google has to sell advertising around search terms people use
  • restrictions on advertisers from moving their online ad campaigns to rival search engines

Google is expected to respond to these concerns shortly.

If found guilty of breaching EU anti-trust rules, Google would face a fine of up to $4bn (£2.5bn).

Article source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20899032#sa-ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=PublicRSS20-sa

Broadband providers launch appeal

Man using a laptopBirmingham City Council secured funding to develop a superfast broadband network

BT and Virgin Media have launched a legal challenge against Birmingham City Council’s plans to build a superfast broadband network.

The council had successfully applied for European Commission State Aid funding for the scheme.

The council argues that it will help local areas which are underserved by existing providers.

However Virgin Media argues there is “significant overbuild” with its current network.

Birmingham City Council wants to build a 100+Mbps (megabits per second) broadband network to serve specific local areas including Digbeth, Eastside and the city’s Jewellery Quarter.

It says that businesses in those areas do not have access to “affordable” high speed broadband.

It is one of the first European cities to acquire EC State Aid for a superfast broadband initiative and the council claims “up to 1,000 jobs” could be created by the project.

‘Test case’

Councillor James McKay said the council was “extremely disappointed” by the actions of BT and Virgin Media.

“The city has worked in a very positive and collaborative way with them over the last few years to help inform and develop our business case and we are surprised that they have now chosen to appeal at such a late stage,” he said in a statement.

“We are liaising with government and the European Commission and we are advocating that this matter be treated with some urgency as a ‘test case’ for Europe and that everything that can be done to expedite it through the legal process is done.”

Virgin Media said the plan “involves a significant overbuild” with its existing network.

“We fully support the Urban Broadband Fund and government ambitions to bring superfast broadband to areas not currently served by existing fibre networks,” said the broadband provider.

“So it’s disappointing that Birmingham City Council has put forward a scheme which is not in the interests of local people and we believe, as a result, the European Commission has made a decision based on inaccurate and misleading information which could waste public money.”

“Virgin and BT have had plenty of time to modernise, and they haven’t,” said Chris Conder, a campaigner for rural broadband.

“It’s time to stand up for the Davids against these Goliaths.”

Birmingham was on the original list of 10 UK destinations set to benefit initially from a £100m UK government fund to create “super-connected” cities.

Chancellor George Osborne announced the plans earlier this year, which should see three million UK residents benefit from high-speed broadband by the year 2015.

Article source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20027439#sa-ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=PublicRSS20-sa

Google tackles competition case

Google logo seen through a windowGoogle has offered to change the way it works to head off an EU legal battle

Google has written to the European competition commissioner proposing to change its search system to head off a legal battle over its market dominance.

Chairman Eric Schmidt wrote to Joaquin Almunia offering to address the four areas of concern.

The search giant has been under European Commission scrutiny since 2010, following complaints from rivals.

Mr Almunia has said failure to change Google’s business practices could result in a hefty fine.

Details of the letter, written by Mr Schmidt have not been made public, but a Google spokesman said: “We have made a proposal to address the four areas the European Commission described as potential concerns. We continue to work cooperatively with the commission.”

The four areas being investigated by the European Commission are:

  • how Google favours its own services in its search results
  • how it displays content from other websites
  • how it manages ads appearing next to search results
  • how its actions affect marketers’ ability to buy ads on rival networks

A spokesman for Mr Almunia has confirmed receiving the letter but no details have been disclosed.

Potential penalties

If a settlement is not reached and the European Commission files a case against Google, it could end with the search giant being fined up to 10% of its annual revenue. Based on last year’s revenue that could be as much as $3.8bn (£2.4bn).

Mr Almunia has said he would rather have a swift settlement than a protracted legal battle.

The Microsoft-backed Initiative for a Competitive Online Marketplace (Icomp) welcomed the concessions.

“Despite coming two years late, today’s acceptance of the commission’s ‘framework’ and possible offer of remedies is a hugely significant acknowledgement by Google of their market dominance and recognition of illegal anti-competitive behaviour,” said David Wood, counsel for Icomp.

“It is essential that the proposed remedies receive vigorous scrutiny not only by the commission but also by third parties, to ensure they provide full redress for the damage caused by Google’s behaviour and prevent its repetition.

“Any failure to do so will likely have grave consequences for online competition, innovation and consumer choice.”

Google also faces competition investigations in the US, South Korea and India.

In the US the Federal Trade Commission looks set for a legal battle, over whether Google unfairly highlighted its own services in its search results.

Article source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-18687240#sa-ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=PublicRSS20-sa

Google denies holding up probe

Google logoGoogle is accused of trying to hide documents

Google has denied that it is preventing a Texas investigation into whether it is abusing its dominance of the internet search market.

It comes after Texan attorney general Greg Abbott accused the company of improperly refusing to hand over evidence he had requested, totalling more than 14,500 documents.

Google said it had “shared hundreds of thousands of documents” with Mr Abbott.

Mr Abbott is asking a judge to order Google to release the relevant files.

The dispute over the missing documents centres on whether they are communications between Google employees and the company’s lawyers.

If that is the case then they are protected by attorney-client privilege and do not need to be released.

Mr Abbott accuses Google of trying to hide documents that do not fall under such legal protection.

‘Deliberately impeded’

The dispute in Texas comes two months after US watchdog, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), fined Google $25,000 (£15,700) after it ruled that the company had held back an investigation into Google’s Street View mapping feature.

The FCC said Google had “deliberately impeded and delayed” the investigation for months, by not responding to requests for information and documents.

Google disputed the FCC’s findings.

The company is also continuing to face anti-competition investigations in a number of other US states.

In addition, the European Commission said last month that Google had to take action to allay concerns that it is abusing its dominant position.

Article source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-18549171#sa-ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=PublicRSS20-sa